What if Everest went underwater?

What if Everest went underwater?

Put Everest in Challenger Deep and its summit would still be about 2.1 km underwater.

≈2.1 km of water above the summit

The deepest known point of the ocean is deeper than Earth's highest summit is high.

Calculated comparison

Why this is interesting

Earth's highest summit and its deepest known seafloor are usually measured in opposite directions from sea level. Line them up on the same reference, and the ocean wins — by more than two kilometres.

How this measurement works

Challenger Deep's deepest observed seafloor is 10,935 m (±6 m) below mean sea level. Everest's summit is 8,848.86 m above it.

Subtract one from the other and about 2.1 km is left over. The trench depth carries a ±6 m uncertainty, so the result shouldn't be read to the centimetre.

This is a datum-aligned thought experiment. It doesn't mean Everest would physically fit inside the trench, or that the trench is shaped like a mountain.

See the math

Challenger Deep depth
10,935 m (±6 m)Source value
Below mean sea level
Everest elevation
8,848.86 mSource value
Jointly announced by Nepal and China, 2020
Difference
10,935 − 8,848.86 = 2,086.14 mCalculated
Published
≈2.1 km underwaterResult
Rounded — the ±6 m depth doesn't support centimetres

How certain is this?

Derived comparison from authoritative reference values. Challenger Deep from NOAA-supported research (±6 m), Everest from the 2020 Nepal–China announcement. The subtraction is Scaleidoscope's, rounded to about 2.1 km because the depth input carries uncertainty.

Derived by us from two published values; the Challenger Deep depth is treated as approximate. No source states this comparison directly.

Sources & further reading

Follow this rabbit hole

Related reading

Keep going