Wait, what?

A container “full” of ping-pong balls can still be about 36% empty

About 36% of the volume can still be air.

The 36% figure follows from the same approximate 64% dense-disordered packing model used for Scaleidoscope's ping-pong-container estimate. It is not a universal measurement of every container filled with balls.

Packing estimate

Why this is interesting

“Full” sounds like it should mean 100% occupied. With spheres, it doesn't.

When identical balls settle into a dense but jumbled arrangement, empty pockets remain between their curved surfaces. Using a packing benchmark of about 64%: 64% ball + 36% empty space = 100% container volume.

So a container can look completely full of balls while more than one-third of its geometric volume is still air.

How this measurement works

The 36% isn't a separate experimental measurement. It is simply the complement of the packing model: 100% − 64% = 36%.

Change the arrangement and the empty fraction changes too.

Neater packing leaves less empty space

The densest possible packing of identical spheres reaches approximately 74.05% occupied space. That leaves approximately 25.95% empty.

So there is no universal rule saying spheres must leave 36% empty. The arrangement matters.

“Full” doesn't always mean every cubic centimetre is occupied

In ordinary language, a box can be full when no more objects can conveniently be added.

In geometry, we can separately ask what fraction of its volume is actually occupied by solid material. Those are different meanings of “full.”

How certain is this?

Approximate / model-dependent. The arithmetic from 64% to 36% is exact. The underlying 64% packing assumption is approximate and depends on the packing protocol and definition used.

Dense random packing of equal spheres leaves roughly 36% void space.

Sources & further reading

Follow this rabbit hole

Related reading

Keep going